February 13, 2022Answering the fourth question of “anti-patriot”: “How is your treason charge? Or do you have any influential connection that nobody dares to punish?”
Answer :
Where were you when the court issued a verdict with the following charges?
– Making an appearance to the public by words, writings, or any other means which is not an act within the purpose of the Constitution
– Instigating or causing a strike, lockout, or concerted cessation of trade or business, to coerce the Government
– Entering the office under the possession of the other person
– Entering the immovable property belonging to the other person
According to Section 90 of the Criminal Code, when any act is one, and it violates several provisions of the law, the offender shall receive the severest punishment.
The charge of collaborating to instigate strikes to force the government, the sixteenth defendant (Buddha Isara) was guilty with three charges. Each charge is to receive imprisonment of one year and six months.
The charge of collaboratively making an appearance to the public by words, writings, or any other means is not an act within the purpose of the Constitution; the sixteenth defendant is to be imprisoned for one year and six months.
The charge of collaborating to obstruct the election; the sixteenth defendant to be imprisoned for one year.
However, due to the offender’s voluntary surrender to an official and the
information is given or the Court for the benefit of the trial, the court has reduced the punishment by one-third of each charge, as follows.
The charge of collaborating to instigate strikes to force the government, the sixteenth defendant (Buddha Isara) to receive imprisonment of three years (three charges).
The charge of collaboratively making an appearance to the public by words, writings, or any other means is not an act within the purpose of the Constitution; the sixteenth defendant is to be imprisoned one year (one charge).
The charge of collaborating to obstruct the election; the sixteenth defendant to be imprisoned for eight months (one charge).
Altogether, the sixteenth defendant was to be imprisoned for four years and eight months.
Other accusations and indictments are dismissed.
****************
Even the Ministers
****************
Mr. Thaworn Senneam, Deputy Minister of Interior
Mr. Puttipong Punnakanta, Minister of Digital Economy and Society
Mr. Nataphol Teepsuwan, Minister of Education
****************
If I had had any connection, would I have been punished like this? The Court of First Instance also rejected my bail request.
The three ministers were ousted from their posts.
More importantly, we have never run away from legal prosecution.
We have never complained and blamed the court rulings.
We are ready to accept our destiny, resulting from our actions.
When we dared to do it, we must dare to accept the outcomes of such deeds, whether good or bad.
If we had had a powerful connection, would the court have rejected our bail request that day?
Please think it through and follow news from various sources.
Don’t be obsessed with the media that like to make you hate us. I would like to update you on the treason charge.
The case is now under appeal to the court. I am not sure when the court will call for a trial?
Oh…please do not forget to read all the five answers to your questions.
Buddha Isara
